[Bug or what?] Some symbols are dissapeared...

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

Hi, Ingo!

Here the picture and extracted text with the error.

First

Picture

Text:

"VFNVHB+CMR12~38",#000000,11.95,91.9180,216.7194,440.0074,216.7194,440.0074,228.6865,91.9180,228.6865,"was approximated by a Landau-type of polynomial as a function of"  "MNKVHB+CMMI12~3e",#000000,11.95,444.3273,216.7313,449.3604,216.7313,449.3604,228.6865,444.3273,228.6865,"c"  "VFNVHB+CMR12~38",#000000,11.95,453.5603,216.7194,486.1798,216.7194,486.1798,228.6865,453.5603,228.6865,"and ."  

Why after the "and " is empty character ?

Second

Picture

Text:

"PDMFNG+CMR10",#000000,10.90,132.5893,355.2330,413.0833,355.2330,413.0833,366.1421,132.5893,366.1421,"0 14. Experiments were performed for indentation loads of"

"JGBFNG+CMMI10",#000000,10.90,137.9784,355.2330,140.9675,355.2330,140.9675,366.1421,137.9784,366.1421,"."

"JGBFNG+CMMI10",#000000,10.90,416.9232,355.2330,423.8723,355.2330,423.8723,366.1421,416.9232,366.1421,"F"

"PDMFNG+CMR10",#000000,10.90,428.7922,355.2330,512.4212,355.2330,512.4212,366.1421,428.7922,366.1421,"= 65N, 100N and" 

Why after the "loads of" and before "F" is "." character?

Edited by Dmitry - 17 Jan 07 at 3:29AM

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
Dmitry Members Profile Find Members Posts Team Player Joined: 21 Sep 06 Status: Offline Points: 47	Post Options Post Reply Quote Dmitry Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Topic: [Bug or what?] Some symbols are dissapeared... Posted: 17 Jan 07 at 2:59AM
	Hi, Ingo! Here the picture and extracted text with the error. First Picture Text: "VFNVHB+CMR12~38",#000000,11.95,91.9180,216.7194,440.0074,216.7194,440.0074,228.6865,91.9180,228.6865,"was approximated by a Landau-type of polynomial as a function of" "MNKVHB+CMMI12~3e",#000000,11.95,444.3273,216.7313,449.3604,216.7313,449.3604,228.6865,444.3273,228.6865,"c" "VFNVHB+CMR12~38",#000000,11.95,453.5603,216.7194,486.1798,216.7194,486.1798,228.6865,453.5603,228.6865,"and ." Why after the "and " is empty character ? Second Picture Text: "PDMFNG+CMR10",#000000,10.90,132.5893,355.2330,413.0833,355.2330,413.0833,366.1421,132.5893,366.1421,"0 14. Experiments were performed for indentation loads of" "JGBFNG+CMMI10",#000000,10.90,137.9784,355.2330,140.9675,355.2330,140.9675,366.1421,137.9784,366.1421,"." "JGBFNG+CMMI10",#000000,10.90,416.9232,355.2330,423.8723,355.2330,423.8723,366.1421,416.9232,366.1421,"F" "PDMFNG+CMR10",#000000,10.90,428.7922,355.2330,512.4212,355.2330,512.4212,366.1421,428.7922,366.1421,"= 65N, 100N and" Why after the "loads of" and before "F" is "." character? Edited by Dmitry - 17 Jan 07 at 3:29AM

Ingo Members Profile Find Members Posts Moderator Group Joined: 29 Oct 05 Status: Offline Points: 3524	Post Options Post Reply Quote Ingo Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 17 Jan 07 at 3:47AM
	Hi Dimitry! I've only a universal answer... ;-) The textextraction doesn't extract the textcontent "line by line" (like you read it). The extraction extract first what was insert first. If you have a page where first header and footer was inserted, you'll extract first header and (the end of the page) footer and after this the content from the middle. If you have a text with several columns it's hardly possible to read the text later 'cause first all rows of the first column will be extracted. On the last two values you can see the start positions (row and column) of each string in pixels. So you can see at the second picture that all strings are in the same pixel-row (366) but the columns are very different. The point isn't directly before the F. He is far away on the left (outside of the picture. Normally you'll extract longer strings but if this point was inserted alone later he'll appears as a single string. Best regards, Ingo

Dmitry Members Profile Find Members Posts Team Player Joined: 21 Sep 06 Status: Offline Points: 47	Post Options Post Reply Quote Dmitry Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 17 Jan 07 at 4:30AM
	Thanks, Ingo!