Debenu Quick PDF Library - PDF SDK Community Forum : Performance 8.16 http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Sun, 05 Apr 2026 00:17:42 +0000 Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:42:18 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 11.01 360 www.quickpdf.org/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=2381 <![CDATA[Debenu Quick PDF Library - PDF SDK Community Forum]]> http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/forum_images/QPDF_Forum_Title.png http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/ <![CDATA[Performance 8.16 : Werner,so unfortunately seems...]]> http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/performance-816_topic2381_post10117.html#10117 Author: darkv
Subject: 2381
Posted: 13 Sep 12 at 9:42AM

Werner,

so unfortunately seems the issue is in the lib ..... so could not help

Rgds
Eric
]]> Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:42:18 +0000 http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/performance-816_topic2381_post10117.html#10117 <![CDATA[Performance 8.16 : Hi DarkV,it is rather the same...]]> http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/performance-816_topic2381_post10115.html#10115 Author: edvoigt
Subject: 2381
Posted: 13 Sep 12 at 8:37AM

Hi DarkV,

it is rather the same time needed under 8.14. Today there is the time of 65 seconds for the PDF I did use a year ago. The allmost breakdown was from 7.23 to 7.24. Under 8.xx I see no big differences.

All measuring was done under XP, 32 Bit.

I use Delphi 7 and SetRenderScale + RenderPageToStream to produce the image for display.

But as I see with different PDFs the slowdown is a generell and I see no binding to a special kind of images inside the PDF or anything else in this direction.

Werner
]]> Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:37:36 +0000 http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/performance-816_topic2381_post10115.html#10115 <![CDATA[Performance 8.16 : do you have the same results between...]]> http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/performance-816_topic2381_post10113.html#10113 Author: darkv
Subject: 2381
Posted: 13 Sep 12 at 12:20AM

do you have the same results between 7.x and 8.x in 32bits version ?

Rgds


]]> Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:20:21 +0000 http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/performance-816_topic2381_post10113.html#10113 <![CDATA[Performance 8.16 : Hi Andrew,long time ago, I did...]]> http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/performance-816_topic2381_post10112.html#10112 Author: edvoigt
Subject: 2381
Posted: 12 Sep 12 at 6:23PM

Hi Andrew,

long time ago, I did send under case 8001 in FogBugz a PDF which was renderred in 5 seconds and after changing only the version, it takes under the same system on the same hardware 60 seconds.

This case is open over a year.

QuickPDF is a nice tool, but the bad renderspeed let me look for another.


Cheers,

Werner


]]> Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:23:34 +0000 http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/performance-816_topic2381_post10112.html#10112 <![CDATA[Performance 8.16 : We have added a lot of code...]]> http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/performance-816_topic2381_post10023.html#10023 Author: AndrewC
Subject: 2381
Posted: 28 Aug 12 at 8:20AM


We have added a lot of code for font handling but even so it shouldn't slow down the process that much.

Can you post some test code showing exactly which functions you are using and I will see if I can replicate the problem and see where the slowdown is happing.

You could also create an official support case and send us the code sample privately if your prefer.

  http://www.quickpdflibrary.com/support/support-query.php

Andrew.
]]> Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:20:33 +0000 http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/performance-816_topic2381_post10023.html#10023 <![CDATA[Performance 8.16 : Hi Simon!Speed-limitation was...]]> http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/performance-816_topic2381_post10012.html#10012 Author: Ingo
Subject: 2381
Posted: 24 Aug 12 at 9:35AM

Hi Simon!

Speed-limitation was never integrated into the testversion of QP.
It's possible that inside a function there are many added changes
until the current version doing a better/more acurate job.
So i would expect that if the job runs longer at least the result
is better.

Cheers and welcome,
Ingo

]]> Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:35:29 +0000 http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/performance-816_topic2381_post10012.html#10012 <![CDATA[Performance 8.16 : Hello,I had an old version...]]> http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/performance-816_topic2381_post10011.html#10011 Author: SimFirehawk
Subject: 2381
Posted: 24 Aug 12 at 9:08AM

Hello,

I had an old version of QuickPDF (7.23) and created around 3000 pages in 35sec. Sadly the old version does not support 64-Bit, so I need to migrate to 8.16. I downloaded the trial version and run my generation of the 3000 pages again. Now it takes around 85sec. So this is more then double the time before.

I thought, maybe it is a restriction of the trial version. So I took a trial version of 7.23 and run the tests again. Same result. Even with the trial version of 7.23 it takes only 35 sec against the trial version of 8.16 with 85 sec.

I am very happy about any hints given to resolve the performance problem.

Simon

UPDATE: I can specifiy that it is the method "DrawTextBox", which needs this extra time


Edited by SimFirehawk - 24 Aug 12 at 9:29AM]]> Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:08:56 +0000 http://www.quickpdf.org/forum/performance-816_topic2381_post10011.html#10011